<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogger Sentiment Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tasgall.com/2006/07/14/blogger-sentiment-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tasgall.com/2006/07/14/blogger-sentiment-poll/</link>
	<description>Peering into the Cauldron of the Gods...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:20:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quicksilver</title>
		<link>http://www.tasgall.com/2006/07/14/blogger-sentiment-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Quicksilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tasgall.com/2006/07/14/blogger-sentiment-poll/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>If you visit the Ticker Sense site, you&#039;ll see that the actual list of regular contributers to the poll is much larger.  This is just the list that contributed to this one week&#039;s poll.  I&#039;ve gone ahead and added every one I could to my Bloglines subscriptions and I&#039;ll start monitoring them for quality.  I&#039;m sure that I&#039;ll delete quite a few out of shear lack of interest since some are pure stock pick blogs. Nothing againts stocks, I just don&#039;t trade &#039;em right now.  I&#039;m more interested in people with an eye on the big picture and sentiment.

On an unrelated side note, in adding this huge list of blogs to my feed reader, I noticed that of the two standards for blog feeds, Atom and RSS, Atom is the huge favorite.  I wonder if that is really a reflection of preference or if it&#039;s just because it appears first in alphabetical order on the list of feeds.  Never underestimate the power of being listed first.  This doesn&#039;t really have any significance but it is interesting to see leading standards emerge before your eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you visit the Ticker Sense site, you&#8217;ll see that the actual list of regular contributers to the poll is much larger.  This is just the list that contributed to this one week&#8217;s poll.  I&#8217;ve gone ahead and added every one I could to my Bloglines subscriptions and I&#8217;ll start monitoring them for quality.  I&#8217;m sure that I&#8217;ll delete quite a few out of shear lack of interest since some are pure stock pick blogs. Nothing againts stocks, I just don&#8217;t trade &#8216;em right now.  I&#8217;m more interested in people with an eye on the big picture and sentiment.</p>
<p>On an unrelated side note, in adding this huge list of blogs to my feed reader, I noticed that of the two standards for blog feeds, Atom and RSS, Atom is the huge favorite.  I wonder if that is really a reflection of preference or if it&#8217;s just because it appears first in alphabetical order on the list of feeds.  Never underestimate the power of being listed first.  This doesn&#8217;t really have any significance but it is interesting to see leading standards emerge before your eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.tasgall.com/2006/07/14/blogger-sentiment-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tasgall.com/2006/07/14/blogger-sentiment-poll/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Nice list...I wonder if anyone is going to take the time to rank these bloggers in terms of general accuracy and/or define each of them as being typically bearish/bullish, typically focused on fundamentals, etc.  I do wonder how anyone has time to process all the information that&#039;s floating out there....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice list&#8230;I wonder if anyone is going to take the time to rank these bloggers in terms of general accuracy and/or define each of them as being typically bearish/bullish, typically focused on fundamentals, etc.  I do wonder how anyone has time to process all the information that&#8217;s floating out there&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

