<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sectors &#8211; Know which crowd your stock is hanging out with</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tasgall.com/2006/08/28/sectors-know-which-crowd-your-stock-is-hanging-out-with/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tasgall.com/2006/08/28/sectors-know-which-crowd-your-stock-is-hanging-out-with/</link>
	<description>Peering into the Cauldron of the Gods...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:20:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason G.</title>
		<link>http://www.tasgall.com/2006/08/28/sectors-know-which-crowd-your-stock-is-hanging-out-with/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 05:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tasgall.com/2006/08/28/sectors-know-which-crowd-your-stock-is-hanging-out-with/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>My understanding of the term &#039;alpha&#039; in the investment community at large is that it is the performance gain (or loss) from a manager&#039;s presence.  When people talk about &quot;seeking alpha&quot; they&#039;re talking about finding good managers for their investments.

As such, it might make sense to apply Quicksilver&#039;s formula to an individual security, but only if you want to replace an entire asset class (or benchmark) with that security.  E.g., replacing all domestic equity with MSFT.  But then again, is that MSFT&#039;s alpha, or is it &lt;i&gt;your alpha&lt;/i&gt; for choosing MSFT over, say, INTC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding of the term &#8216;alpha&#8217; in the investment community at large is that it is the performance gain (or loss) from a manager&#8217;s presence.  When people talk about &#8220;seeking alpha&#8221; they&#8217;re talking about finding good managers for their investments.</p>
<p>As such, it might make sense to apply Quicksilver&#8217;s formula to an individual security, but only if you want to replace an entire asset class (or benchmark) with that security.  E.g., replacing all domestic equity with MSFT.  But then again, is that MSFT&#8217;s alpha, or is it <i>your alpha</i> for choosing MSFT over, say, INTC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quicksilver</title>
		<link>http://www.tasgall.com/2006/08/28/sectors-know-which-crowd-your-stock-is-hanging-out-with/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Quicksilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tasgall.com/2006/08/28/sectors-know-which-crowd-your-stock-is-hanging-out-with/#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Please note that the &quot;Weighted Alpha&quot; mentioned on Barchart is not the same alpha dicussed in my other post.  I think this is misleading.  Looking up the definition on the site it reads &quot;measure of how much a stock has changed in the one-year period...weight[ed] to recent activity.&quot;  This isn&#039;t alpha.  It&#039;s simply weighted return.  What would actually be useful is real alpha.  I&#039;m working now on putting together some stats (including real alpha and relative strength) on the Select Sector SPDRs that might get us started on a good approach to sector portfolios.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note that the &#8220;Weighted Alpha&#8221; mentioned on Barchart is not the same alpha dicussed in my other post.  I think this is misleading.  Looking up the definition on the site it reads &#8220;measure of how much a stock has changed in the one-year period&#8230;weight[ed] to recent activity.&#8221;  This isn&#8217;t alpha.  It&#8217;s simply weighted return.  What would actually be useful is real alpha.  I&#8217;m working now on putting together some stats (including real alpha and relative strength) on the Select Sector SPDRs that might get us started on a good approach to sector portfolios.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quicksilver</title>
		<link>http://www.tasgall.com/2006/08/28/sectors-know-which-crowd-your-stock-is-hanging-out-with/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Quicksilver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tasgall.com/2006/08/28/sectors-know-which-crowd-your-stock-is-hanging-out-with/#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Barchart is great.  I&#039;ve been a long, long time member of their advanced commodities section.  I&#039;ve never been to the sector area but I like it.  I&#039;ll have to play with it more and get back to you on your question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barchart is great.  I&#8217;ve been a long, long time member of their advanced commodities section.  I&#8217;ve never been to the sector area but I like it.  I&#8217;ll have to play with it more and get back to you on your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

